On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 3:08 AM Adam Kaplan <adam.kaplan(a)redhat.com> wrote:
The OpenShift Origin folks use a sizing scale from XS to XXL, those
are labels attached to a PR via the CI bot. Stick with that for consistency?
XS to XXL sounds good, but you mentioned the bot assigns these labels to
the PR and not the issue? The purpose is to give a heads up to the
I am guessing it is done based on the number of line changes.. How much
amount of changes is marked as XS and up to XXL.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Anjan Nath <kaludios(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> As the subject says, I feel adding labels like (size/big)
> (size/small), etc, to the
> issues would be helpful to outside contributors, for deciding if they
> want to work
> on it, as well as we can sync our sprint planning task size to github
> issues that
> way. It will also be helpful in scenarios where we do some spike around
> an issue
> and we can then mark on the issue how much work would be required.
> What do you guys think?
> Minishift Mailing List mailing list -- minishift(a)lists.minishift.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to minishift-leave(a)lists.minishift.io
SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER - OPENSHIFT
Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/>
100 E Davie St Raleigh, NC 27601 USA
adam.kaplan(a)redhat.com T: +1-919-754-4843 IM: adambkaplan