3:20 a.m.
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty <lmohanty(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Hardy Ferentschik <hardy(a)ferentschik.de>
wrote:
>
> any more strong feelings regarding 'addons' vs 'add-ons' regarding
the
> repo name?
>
I would suggest we append "minishift" to the repo name because when an
user clones the repo the local directory name would be better if it is
minishift-addons as compared to add-ons or addons.
I believe this is up to the user. I have many repository renamed by hand,
to create some order, and if the name is in use already they get an
alternative name (suffixed with -1 IIRC) . For instance, docker/machine is
also a very generic term, or expressjs/express. I think minishift/addons is
clear enough. Although, as I mentioned I'd rather see 'contrib' as it
indicates that people can propose addons and other material which serve or
help with minishift. Pretty much as what is done for many of the ansible
repos we have. Renaming a repository is not something you should think
lightly about (rather don't do).